Skip to the results
128 Results filtered by...
Filter
Agency > Office of Policy and Management Clear All

Public Safety
Story
Data story comparing OPM CJPPD's annual DOC population estimates to recent first-of-the-month counts.
Tags correction count facility population
Updated
June 20 2024
Views
63

Local Government
Dataset
This dataset provides the neighboring relationships between towns, with each row representing a unique town-to-neighbor connection. It includes columns for the town's name and the corresponding neighboring town name. Most towns have more than one neighbor, so there will be multiple rows for each town.
See the "Attachments" section below to download a pivoted version of this dataset named "CT Neighboring Towns in Wide Format". This includes one row for each town, a column for each neighboring town, and a total sum of neighboring towns.
Tags boundaries boundary ct towns
API Docs
Updated
July 10 2024
Views
98

Local Government
Filtered View
Municipal Fiscal Indicators is an annual compendium of information compiled by the Office of Policy and Management, Office of Finance, Municipal Finance Services Unit (MFS). Municipal Fiscal Indicators contains the most current financial data available for each of Connecticut's 169 municipalities.
The data contained in Indicators provides key financial and demographic information on municipalities in Connecticut. The data includes selected demographic and economic data relating to, or having an impact upon, a municipality’s financial condition.
The majority of this data was compiled from the audited financial statements that are filed annually with the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management, Office of Finance. Unlike prior years' where the audited financial information was compiled by OPM, the FY 2021 information in this edition was based upon the self-reporting by municipalities of their own audited data.
The most recent edition is for the Fiscal Years Ended 2017-2021 published in July 2023.
Note: This dataset does not include data for the following municipalities, which did not complete the UCOA reporting process: Bolton, Colebrook, Mansfield, New Haven, North Branford, North Haven, Seymour, Warren, West Hartford.
Tags 2021 municipal fiscal indicators municipal fiscal indicators opm ucoa uniform chart of accounts
API Docs
Updated
August 2 2023
Views
96

Government
External Link

This feature layer includes all OPM collected data at the town level.

-------------

The Connecticut Broadband Availability and Adoption Maps
were created to help citizens and policymakers understand the strengths and
weaknesses of broadband infrastructure in the state. Data is aggregated to the
block, tract, and town (county subdivision) levels and includes counts of
locations classified as unserved, underserved, and served as well as whether
they meet the state goal of 1000Mbps/100Mbps. This application splits its
visualizations into block, tract, and town layers for both unserved locations
and progress to the state goal.

This map uses OPM collected availability and adoption data.

As of 2023, OPM collected availability data was submitted by
internet service providers pursuant to PA 21-159 and processed by the GIS
Office in the Office of Policy and Management, cleaned, and matched to the
CostQuest location fabric.

Metadata:

All feature layers, maps, and datasets including OPM's
internal broadband availability data follows the same basic schema with
additional fields added in some case for convenience.

Fields named no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
GigC are counts of locations where a particular level of broadband service is
provided, No service locations are those where there is no reported service at
all. Unserved locations are locations where there is a provider offering
wireline service, but not at or above 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved locations are locations where at least one provider offers wireline
service of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, but there is no provider
offering wireline service of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
locations are locations where there is wireline service of at least 100 Mbps
download and 20 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the count of locations that have
service at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. Accordingly, total locations
is equal to the sum of no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
"GigC" locations. Availability also includes fields for average
download and upload speeds. These are calculated at the relevant level of
census geography based on the maximum for all locations.

The final field included in all availability data is the
provider list.

OPM collected adoption data:

OPM collected adoption data uses many of the same naming
conventions as the availability data, but there are some notable differences.

Fields named unserved_Sub, underserved_Sub, served_Sub, and
GigC _Sub are counts of subscriptions where a particular level of broadband
service is currently subscribed to, Unserved subscriptions are subscriptions
that do not meet the standard of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved subscriptions are subscriptions with speeds of 25 Mbps download and
3 Mbps upload, but not meeting 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
subscriptions are subscriptions where speeds are between 100 Mbps download and
20 Mbps upload and 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the
count of locations that have a subscription at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps
upload or higher. For subscription data these locations are NOT included in the
"served" field as this does not directly apply to FCC use of the
terms.

Tags No tags assigned
Updated
September 12 2024
Views
95

Government
External Link

This feature layer includes all data available at the block level - no adoption data is available at this level.

-------

The Connecticut Broadband Availability and Adoption Maps
were created to help citizens and policymakers understand the strengths and
weaknesses of broadband infrastructure in the state. Data is aggregated to the
block, tract, and town (county subdivision) levels and includes counts of
locations classified as unserved, underserved, and served as well as whether
they meet the state goal of 1000Mbps/100Mbps. This application splits its
visualizations into block, tract, and town layers for both unserved locations
and progress to the state goal.

This map uses OPM collected availability and adoption data.

As of 2023, OPM collected availability data was submitted by
internet service providers pursuant to PA 21-159 and processed by the GIS
Office in the Office of Policy and Management, cleaned, and matched to the
CostQuest location fabric.

Metadata:

All feature layers, maps, and datasets including OPM's
internal broadband availability data follows the same basic schema with
additional fields added in some case for convenience.

Fields named no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
GigC are counts of locations where a particular level of broadband service is
provided, No service locations are those where there is no reported service at
all. Unserved locations are locations where there is a provider offering
wireline service, but not at or above 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved locations are locations where at least one provider offers wireline
service of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, but there is no provider
offering wireline service of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
locations are locations where there is wireline service of at least 100 Mbps
download and 20 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the count of locations that have
service at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. Accordingly, total locations
is equal to the sum of no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
"GigC" locations. Availability also includes fields for average
download and upload speeds. These are calculated at the relevant level of
census geography based on the maximum for all locations.

The final field included in all availability data is the
provider list.

OPM collected adoption data:

OPM collected adoption data uses many of the same naming
conventions as the availability data, but there are some notable differences.

Fields named unserved_Sub, underserved_Sub, served_Sub, and
GigC _Sub are counts of subscriptions where a particular level of broadband
service is currently subscribed to, Unserved subscriptions are subscriptions
that do not meet the standard of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved subscriptions are subscriptions with speeds of 25 Mbps download and
3 Mbps upload, but not meeting 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
subscriptions are subscriptions where speeds are between 100 Mbps download and
20 Mbps upload and 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the
count of locations that have a subscription at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps
upload or higher. For subscription data these locations are NOT included in the
"served" field as this does not directly apply to FCC use of the
terms.

Tags No tags assigned
Updated
September 12 2024
Views
87

Government
External Link

This feature layer provides all OPM collected data at the tract level.

------

The Connecticut Broadband Availability and Adoption Maps
were created to help citizens and policymakers understand the strengths and
weaknesses of broadband infrastructure in the state. Data is aggregated to the
block, tract, and town (county subdivision) levels and includes counts of
locations classified as unserved, underserved, and served as well as whether
they meet the state goal of 1000Mbps/100Mbps. This application splits its
visualizations into block, tract, and town layers for both unserved locations
and progress to the state goal.

This map uses OPM collected availability and adoption data.

As of 2023, OPM collected availability data was submitted by
internet service providers pursuant to PA 21-159 and processed by the GIS
Office in the Office of Policy and Management, cleaned, and matched to the
CostQuest location fabric.

Metadata:

All feature layers, maps, and datasets including OPM's
internal broadband availability data follows the same basic schema with
additional fields added in some case for convenience.

Fields named no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
GigC are counts of locations where a particular level of broadband service is
provided, No service locations are those where there is no reported service at
all. Unserved locations are locations where there is a provider offering
wireline service, but not at or above 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved locations are locations where at least one provider offers wireline
service of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, but there is no provider
offering wireline service of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
locations are locations where there is wireline service of at least 100 Mbps
download and 20 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the count of locations that have
service at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. Accordingly, total locations
is equal to the sum of no service, unserved, underserved, served, and
"GigC" locations. Availability also includes fields for average
download and upload speeds. These are calculated at the relevant level of
census geography based on the maximum for all locations.

The final field included in all availability data is the
provider list.

OPM collected adoption data:

OPM collected adoption data uses many of the same naming
conventions as the availability data, but there are some notable differences.

Fields named unserved_Sub, underserved_Sub, served_Sub, and
GigC _Sub are counts of subscriptions where a particular level of broadband
service is currently subscribed to, Unserved subscriptions are subscriptions
that do not meet the standard of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload.
Underserved subscriptions are subscriptions with speeds of 25 Mbps download and
3 Mbps upload, but not meeting 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served
subscriptions are subscriptions where speeds are between 100 Mbps download and
20 Mbps upload and 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the
count of locations that have a subscription at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps
upload or higher. For subscription data these locations are NOT included in the
"served" field as this does not directly apply to FCC use of the
terms.

Tags No tags assigned
Updated
September 12 2024
Views
84

Local Government
Dataset
Metadata acquired by Towns and COGs for the 2023 Parcel and Computer-Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) data collection.
Tags ct cama 2023 metadata parcels
API Docs
Updated
June 27 2024
Views
51

Local Government
Dataset
Public Act 23-124 modifies the Local Capital Improvement Project (LoCIP) program to provide direct grants to municipalities for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, and forward.
Tags locip locip grant opm
API Docs
Updated
July 19 2024
Views
33